We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. Rankings are formula-based and never paid for. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure

Maytag MHW6630M vs Maytag MHW5630M

Two of the clothes washers in our best clothes washers comparison, lined up spec by spec. Every figure comes from the manufacturer pages linked below, and the scores use the same published formula as the full ranking.

Affiliate disclosure: We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings, which come from the published scoring formula. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more.

#13 of 40 in Clothes Washers

Maytag MHW6630M

7.8/10

Best for: Official IMEF 2.92, 4.8 cu ft volume, 99 kWh/year, official IWF 3.2

Check price at Amazon
#14 of 40 in Clothes Washers

Maytag MHW5630M

7.7/10

Best for: Official IMEF 2.92, 4.5 cu ft volume, 86 kWh/year, official IWF 3.2

Check price at Amazon

Spec-by-spec comparison

Green marks the better published figure. "Not listed" means the manufacturer doesn't publish it.

SpecMaytag MHW6630MMaytag MHW5630MWeight
Integrated Modified Energy Factor (IMEF)Official ENERGY STAR Integrated Modified Energy Factor. A higher IMEF means more washing work per unit of energy. Missing values take the category minimum. 2.92 2.92 28%
Certified volumeOfficial ENERGY STAR certified tub volume in cubic feet. A larger tub is not automatically the right washer for a tight laundry closet. Missing values take the category minimum. 4.8 cu ft 4.5 cu ft 24%
Annual energy useOfficial ENERGY STAR annual energy use in kilowatt-hours per year. Lower is better. Missing values take the category minimum (the highest energy use in the set). 99 kWh/year 86 kWh/year 24%
Integrated Water Factor (IWF)Official ENERGY STAR Integrated Water Factor. A lower IWF means less water per cubic foot of laundry. Missing values take the category minimum (the highest IWF in the set). 3.2 3.2 24%
Integrated Modified Energy Factor, IMEF (ENERGY STAR)2.922.92info
Certified volume (ENERGY STAR)4.8 cu ft4.5 cu ftinfo
Annual energy use (ENERGY STAR)99 kWh/year86 kWh/yearinfo
Integrated Water Factor, IWF (ENERGY STAR)3.23.2info
Annual water use (ENERGY STAR)4541 gal/year4267 gal/yearinfo
IMEF percent above the U.S. federal standard (computed)59%, computed as (official IMEF - official U.S. federal standard IMEF) / official U.S. federal standard IMEF59%, computed as (official IMEF - official U.S. federal standard IMEF) / official U.S. federal standard IMEFinfo
Annual energy use per cubic foot (computed)20.6 kWh/year per cubic foot, computed as official annual energy use ÷ official cubic foot19.1 kWh/year per cubic foot, computed as official annual energy use ÷ official cubic footinfo
U.S. federal standard IMEF (ENERGY STAR)1.841.84info
U.S. federal standard IWF (ENERGY STAR)4.74.7info
Load configuration (ENERGY STAR)Front LoadFront Loadinfo
Dimensions (ENERGY STAR)27.0 in W27.0 in Winfo
Additional washer features (ENERGY STAR)Anti-WrinkleAnti-Wrinkleinfo
Connected (ENERGY STAR)NoNoinfo
Paired ENERGY STAR dryer available (ENERGY STAR)YesYesinfo
Meets ENERGY STAR Most Efficient criteriaNoNoinfo
Certified model numberMHW6630M**MHW5630M**info
Official brand name on the ENERGY STAR recordMaytagMaytaginfo
CyclePick score7.8/107.7/10100%

Where each one comes out ahead

Maytag MHW6630M

Better published figure on: Certified volume.

What we like

  • High official IMEF (2.92)

Watch out for

  • No additional scored gaps in the official record we used

Maytag MHW5630M

Better published figure on: Annual energy use.

What we like

  • High official IMEF (2.92)

Watch out for

  • No additional scored gaps in the official record we used

Verdict

Both official ENERGY STAR records list these models as Front Load. The Maytag MHW5630M record lists official IMEF 2.92, 4.5 cu ft volume, 86 kWh/year and official IWF 3.2. The Maytag MHW6630M record lists official IMEF 2.92, 4.8 cu ft volume, 99 kWh/year and official IWF 3.2.

Maytag MHW6630M on AmazonMaytag MHW5630M on Amazon
Spec sources

Related comparisons