We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. Rankings are formula-based and never paid for. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure

LG WC6907HA vs Samsung WD90F53V

Two of the clothes dryers in our best clothes dryers comparison, lined up spec by spec. Every figure comes from the manufacturer pages linked below, and the scores use the same published formula as the full ranking.

Affiliate disclosure: We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings, which come from the published scoring formula. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more.

#37 of 40 in Clothes Dryers

LG WC6907HA

2.2/10

Best for: Official CEF 3.94, 5.5 cu ft drum capacity, 607 kWh/year

Check price at Amazon
#38 of 40 in Clothes Dryers

Samsung WD90F53V

2.0/10

Best for: Official CEF 3.93, 5.3 cu ft drum capacity, 608 kWh/year

Check price at Amazon

Spec-by-spec comparison

Green marks the better published figure. "Not listed" means the manufacturer doesn't publish it.

SpecLG WC6907HASamsung WD90F53VWeight
Combined Energy Factor (CEF)Official ENERGY STAR Combined Energy Factor. A higher CEF means more drying work per unit of energy. Missing values take the category minimum. 3.94 3.93 36%
Certified drum capacityOfficial ENERGY STAR certified drum capacity in cubic feet. A larger drum is not automatically the right dryer for a tight laundry closet. Missing values take the category minimum. 5.5 cu ft 5.3 cu ft 32%
Estimated annual energy useOfficial ENERGY STAR estimated annual energy use in kilowatt-hours per year. Lower is better. Missing values take the category minimum (the highest energy use in the set). 607 kWh/year 608 kWh/year 32%
Combined Energy Factor, CEF (ENERGY STAR)3.943.93info
Certified drum capacity (ENERGY STAR)5.5 cu ft5.3 cu ftinfo
Estimated annual energy use (ENERGY STAR)607 kWh/year608 kWh/yearinfo
Annual energy use per cubic foot (computed)110.4 kWh/year per cubic foot, computed as official annual energy use ÷ official cubic foot114.7 kWh/year per cubic foot, computed as official annual energy use ÷ official cubic footinfo
Product type (ENERGY STAR)Electric Standard VentedElectric Standard Ventedinfo
Fuel type (ENERGY STAR)ElectricElectricinfo
Vented or ventless (ENERGY STAR)Not listedNot listedinfo
Energy test cycle time (ENERGY STAR)Not listedNot listedinfo
Energy test cycle information (ENERGY STAR)Dry Only, NormalNormal cycle / Normal dryness level / Option: Eco Dry Default "On"info
Dimensions (ENERGY STAR)27 in W43.7 in H × 27 in W × 34.4 in Dinfo
Additional dryer features (ENERGY STAR)Not listedWrinkle prevention optioninfo
Connected (ENERGY STAR)NoNoinfo
Paired ENERGY STAR washer available (ENERGY STAR)Not listedNot listedinfo
Meets ENERGY STAR Most Efficient criteriaYesNoinfo
Certified model numberWC6907H*AWD90F53*V*info
Official brand name on the ENERGY STAR recordLGSamsunginfo
CyclePick score2.2/102.0/10100%

Where each one comes out ahead

LG WC6907HA

Better published figure on: Combined Energy Factor (CEF), Certified drum capacity, Estimated annual energy use.

What we like

  • Official record meets ENERGY STAR Most Efficient criteria

Watch out for

  • No additional scored gaps in the official record we used

Samsung WD90F53V

No scored spec where it is strictly ahead; its case rests on the strengths below.

What we like

  • Official certified ratings are published for every scored criterion

Watch out for

  • No additional scored gaps in the official record we used

Verdict

Both official ENERGY STAR records list these models as Electric Standard Vented. The LG WC6907HA record lists official CEF 3.94, 5.5 cu ft drum capacity and 607 kWh/year. The Samsung WD90F53V record lists official CEF 3.93, 5.3 cu ft drum capacity and 608 kWh/year.

LG WC6907HA on AmazonSamsung WD90F53V on Amazon
Spec sources

Related comparisons